02121nas a2200301 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260001200043100001900055700001900074700002000093700001700113700003100130700001500161700002400176700002000200700002500220700002400245700002400269700001900293700002000312700001900332700001800351245005900369856007200428520130500500022001401805 2021 d c05/20211 aMohamed Hammad1 aRajesh Kandala1 aAmira Abdelatey1 aMoloud Abdar1 aMariam Zomorodi‐Moghadam1 aRu San Tan1 aU. Rajendra Acharya1 aJoanna Pławiak1 aRyszard Tadeusiewicz1 aVladimir Makarenkov1 aNizal Sarrafzadegan1 aAbbas Khosravi1 aSaeid Nahavandi1 aAhmed EL-Latif1 aPawel Plawiak00aAutomated detection of shockable ECG signals: A review uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S00200255210049533 a
Sudden cardiac death from lethal arrhythmia is a preventable cause of death. Ventricular fibrillation and tachycardia are shockable electrocardiographic (ECG)rhythms that can respond to emergency electrical shock therapy and revert to normal sinus rhythm if diagnosed early upon cardiac arrest with the restoration of adequate cardiac pump function. However, manual inspection of ECG signals is a difficult task in the acute setting. Thus, computer-aided arrhythmia classification (CAAC) systems have been developed to detect shockable ECG rhythm. Traditional machine learning and deep learning methods are now progressively employed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of CAAC systems. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art machine and deep learning based CAAC expert systems for shockable ECG signal recognition, discussing their strengths, advantages, and drawbacks. Moreover, unique bispectrum and recurrence plots are proposed to represent shockable and non-shockable ECG signals. Deep learning methods are usually more robust and accurate than standard machine learning methods but require big data of good quality for training. We recommend collecting large accessible ECG datasets with a meaningful proportion of abnormal cases for research and development of superior CAAC systems.
a0020-0255